Mixed Breed – Sadiqa Peerbhoy

pace attack: Roger Binny ( here, takes a catch) played in the Indian cricket team, is one of Bangalore’s better known Anglo Indians

The sandpaper voiced female on FM who begins each strident lambast with a jarring ‘Hey’ reminds me of all the Anglo Indian teachers who guided my early expeditions into books. There was Miss Gloria who, we were sure, had a thing going with the art teacher. There was Miss Jenkins who once acted as an extra in a film. They were the ‘goris’ who came of a mixed ancestry and made endless plans to go “back home” to England. Some day.

Many entered the corporate world as secretaries with tight skirts. Some became models when no Indian girl was permitted to parade on a ramp, some were singers with husky magic in their throats and some were teachers.

They used to be the fun timers born of an uneasy relationship between rulers and ruled and then left behind in India. Their DNA throbbed with music. They loved their tipple and their parties. Often they produced striking beauties with green eyes, chiselled features and complexions like peaches with a wash of gold.

Bangalore’s story as a cantonment for battle-weary troops to recover from the indomitable Tipu, led to a large number of Anglo Indians being bred here, who gave it the reputation of a very happening city. Long before the techies were downloaded from their mother’s wombs. And the rest of India still thought of it as pensioners’ paradise! They partied, sang, danced and drank into the wee hours of the morning and slept through most days.

My friend Ruth still talks about the wild ‘50s when a certain lady was known for her dance of seven veils that were all discarded one by one. Or the lady who came dressed in a tame cobra and little else.

Perhaps that is why a reprobate uncle, who heard we were moving to Bangalore, called me aside to warn about key parties to avoid. These were supposed to be parties at the end of which the car keys of all guests were put in a bowl and each lady picked a key to go home with whomever it belonged to.

Fortunately we never heard of any such shenanigans in Bangalore, but it made me turn down some friendly invitations.

But times changed . The Anglo Indians started drifting away to lands that did not typecast them as fun timers and little else. They left behind old parents in clusters like Lingarajapuram and KGF, to reminisce over faded photographs of colonial bungalows their British ancestors had bequeathed them.

Now they are few and far between. Like the odd members of a live band trying to exist despite the moral police. A couple of models, a cricketer, a beauty contest winner and a host of them swallowed up by call centres. Almost all have given up their distinctive identity to blend in and that is a shame.

To my mind India was richer in its diversity when all creeds, races existed in their uniqueness within its generous spaces. And there was no one to proclaim Maharashtra for Marathas or Karnataka for Kannadigas. In an aviary there are birds of every shape and hue, not one is forced out because the colour is different. Or it chirps in a different set of notes.

20 Responses to “Mixed Breed – Sadiqa Peerbhoy”

  1. Sean Auckland Says:

    This author clearly does not know the first thing about Anglo Indians and I wholy oppose the title ‘Mixed Breed’

  2. Carlton Figg Says:

    The writer has projected some of the uglier sides of the community. And I’m here to point out that those ugly sides belong to every community. I can fault the Anglos of old only on two counts. (1) They had little or no time for education and (2) they were so full of fun that many of them forgot that life was a serious affair. However, as insinuated, our girls were not promiscuous. But yes, they were friendly and courteous. Today, we see girls from other communities showing more cleavage and thigh than our girls did in the old days. At the most, I will concede that our people were years ahead of their time. And they still would have been so — had they not hit the panic button and scattered to all part of the globe after Independence.

    I agree with the writer when she says that we are few and far between. And that truth stems from two facts. (1) The aforementioned scattering and (2) Frank Anthony’s rejection of the Andaman and Nicobar Island as a separate country for the Anglo-Indians.

  3. Carlton Figg Says:

    I believe the time is here for the community to stop bragging, or mourning, about its past. The time has come to reorganise ourselves and to become a cohesive force in the Indian mosaic. If in the past, as many as four Anglos could be in an Indian team of eleven hockey players, why not today ? Use the past as an example, not as a boasting point ! It is my considered opinion that the fall-away from sports by the Anglos is rooted to two reasons. 1. Anglo-Indian schools are Anglo in name only, and these schools have stopped focussing on sporting events. Such schools have closed down their hostels which used to be a major source of inspiration for independent-minded Anglo lads. The elders in Anglo schools (teachers etc) are, by and large, either not Anglos themselves or have never had any links with sports. 2. There is a definite bias against Anglos in official sporting circles. Lesley Claudius would never have been the Indian hockey captain but for the determined stand taken by Kunwar Digvijay Singh “Babu” who stood up and threatened to expose the Indian Hockey Federation which demanded that Claudius be downgraded to the rank of just another player. The IHF’s reason for this demand was their belief that a player with a “British” name could not be the Indian captain. Of course, it is absured to think that I could have documented proof of this — but I was a close friend of Kunwar Digvijay Singh “Babu” (KD Singh “Babu”) who narrated this story to me. He had no reason to lie. In 1967, he told a news meet (I was there) that if he had 15 sporting Anglo-Indians, and if he had six months time, he could turn them into a world-beating hockey team. If he could think along those lines, why can’t we Anglos think like that also. All we need is to overcome our own lack of confidence (we need to stop seeing ourselves as failures, or second-best). We also need to stop glorifying our ancestors and, instead, start following in their footsteps. This lack of confidence has been deliberately forced upon us. Overcome it — and nothing will hold us back.

    But, and I can’t over-emphasise this point, we need a whole new line of leaders who can get the Anglo schools to pull up their socks, and get the Anglo-Indians to look at themselves with a great deal of pride. Not pride in the past, but pride in the present.

  4. Mark Pinto Says:

    Well said Carlton. You’ve hit the nail on the head. the above artcile seemed to~focus on the negative sides of the Anglo-Indians and I totally agree with you that any community would possess the good, the bad and the ugly. Also you hit the nail on the head when you said it’s important that Anglo-Indian leaders emerge and the best way to go about is through Anglo-Indian schools. However it should not be exclusive as that will work against the principles of harmony of communities in a multi ethnic and diverse country such as India. I hope that Anglo-Indians will take pride in their roots and do the communtiy proud in all spheres! I’m not an Anglo-Indian. I’m Goan but I am fascinated byt the Anglo-Indian, the Luso-Indian and the Francophone communites.

  5. Carlton Figg Says:

    Mark, thanks for the support. But apart from your views on the Anglos, there is something else that stood out and called for attention. And that is the palpable pride you have in your own ethnicity. And you are ever so right — we all should be proud of our roots. You displayed that self-esteem when you said: “I’m a Goan”. And I display it whenever I say:”I’m an Anglo-Indian”. That’s what India is all about — togetherness despite the apparent diversity.

    Hang around, Mark Pinto — people like you are sorely needed, especially where I come from.

  6. Gilbert Edgar Freitas Says:

    Sadiqa Peerbhoy should write something about the ‘inbreeding’ that goes on in the Parsee community instead of throwing muck on the Anglo Indians.

  7. Gilbert Edgar Freitas Says:

    Just after Independence the Anglo Indian numbers were diminishing as they were emigrating to England,Australia, Canada, NZ and the States. Mr Frank Anthony informed Mr Nehru that the Anglo Indians were stateless and reminded him about the selfless contribution made by the community though they were microscopic. Mr Nehru very much agreed that the community was literally running the nation by their involvement in the Army, Navy and Air Force besides the Railways, Post & Telegraphs, Power Supply and the Customs. Mr Nehru offered the Andaman and Nicobar Islands to the Anglo Indians as a state within the Indian territory. Mr Frank Anthony, for his personal reasons, refused the offer. It was a certain Mr McCluskie, a rich businessman from Calcutta who owned hundreds of hectares of land near Hazaribagh in Bihar (Jharkand) gave his land for Anglo Indian settlement. At first there was this great Anglo Indian rush to settle but it soon petered out as the call of Mother England was too great.
    In my opinion Mr Frank Anthony did more damage to the Anglo Indian community than good because he used the community for his own advancement. Those with connections with Allahabad know that Mr Anthony was almost a member of the Nehru household.

  8. carlton figg Says:

    Gilbert, I am in total agreement with you. The “great” Frank Anthony had little or no time for the Anglo-Indian community. In fact, there are reports that he failed to establish his own ethnicity. Had it not been for the support of the Nehru family, Anthony would never have made it within a mile of Parliament. He wrote about Britain’s betrayal in India, and yet he was the one to perpetuate the greatest betrayal of Anglo-Indians when he declined to accept Nehru’s offer of the Andaman and Nicobar Islands as a homeland for the community. That decision resulted in Anglo-Indians being scattered to the four corners of the world shortly after Independence.

    Anthony was perhaps aware of the contempt with which the community viewed him — and he knew that he would have ceased to be our leader once we had a homeland of our own. And that would have sent him to an early grave — because, without the community, he was as good as dead.

    The fact is that Anthony and his ilk were never “elected” by the community. They nominated themselves — and wormed their way into leadership positions with the help of Nehru, and later Indira, and some other Congress leaders. Apart from erecting schools (in memory of himself, I may add !) what good has the man done for the community ? He was chiefly responsible for the loss of our job reservations — the community must compete to survive, he often said. Very good, is what I say. But then, why did he hang on to his own reserved job as a member of Parliament ? If he was honest about what he said, Anglo-Indian nominations for Parliament and the Assemblies should have been abolished along with the abolition of reserved jobs.

    I’m not saying all just because the man is dead and cannot offer a rebuttal. I have, in fact, been saying this for the last forty years. I have even said it in his presence — what’s more I have written about his shenanigans in the newspapers. But at that time, mine was a voice in the wilderness.

    I repeat — Anglo-Indians must put together a new line of dedicated leadership for the community. It’s either that or a requiem for the Anglo-Indian !

  9. Gilbert Edgar Freitas Says:

    Carlton, the entnicity of Mr Frank Anthony was always challenged. I remember attending a meeting of the AIAIA, which was held in the Grail Club, Calcutta, in 1962 when a certain Mr MaacDonald who headed the Calcutta branch of the AIAIA challenged the enthicity of Mr. Anthony and two representatives from S. India viz. Narohona and DeMonte. They were accused of enrolling Indian Christians into their Associations (we call this branch stacking here in Australia) to get the numbers in order to be nominated by their
    former president recruited many Bengali and Bettiah (north Bihar) christians with names that was changed from Bose to Bossley, Chatterjee to Chatterton, Halder to Holder , Nath to Nathaniel ,Bannerjee to Bannerman, so on and so forth. Mr MacDonald was aware of this and to his disgust started a screening process by asking the infiltrators to produce their antecedents. When those he suspected could not prove were expelled from the association. Mr MacDonald knew what he was doing because he had a web of connections within the Anglo Indian community and knew who the real ones were and who were the infiltrators. This gentleman was old and lived his whole life in Calcutta. This subject was placed on the table at the meeting and Mr MacDonald challenged Mr Anthony, Mr Norohna and Mr DeMonte to do the same. This led to a big commotion with the meeting being curtailed. The Calcutta branch split and eventually Mr MacDonald resigned. After the meeting we met a gentleman who stood near the entrance of the Grail Club. He spoke with a loud voice saying that he was from Madras and his father was a tobacco cultivator and that he was related to Mr Anthony. How far this was true, I cannot say but Mr Anthony’s ethnicity has been always questioned.
    We who grew up in the early forties know that the Anglo Indian is a diminishing race but it astonishes me when some some people project figures like 500,000 to 700,000 Anglo Indians still exist, scattered all around the globe. If a screening process was in place I would put the figure as only 250,000.

  10. Gilbert Edgar Freitas Says:

    Carlton, I am in full agreement with you. You have taken the words out of my mouth.
    I apologise for a few lines that went missing from the fifth row of my reply because of a blip in my computer. To continue it should be……respective state governors for membership to their legislative assemblies. The Calcutta branch had its own problems when……cont.

  11. carlton figg Says:

    Thanks, Gilly. I have just come out of hospital (heart problem and that kind of stuff) and have been ordered complete bed rest. But I need to appreciate your disclosures and yes, I have no doubt that the community under Frank Anthony was led by a bunch of imposters. Al I can say at this point in time is — “God help the genuine Anglo-Indian”. More on the subject when the doctor gives the nod at my end.

  12. Gilbert Edgar Freitas Says:

    Carlton, I had been away for a short while and have just visited the site on my return.
    Wish you a speedy recovery. Can’t wait for your input.

  13. Rochelle Says:

    Though not familiar with the politicking of Mr. Anthony, I thought I would respond to the initial comments made about this article. Agreed Sean, “mixed breed” is a term with negative connotations in most cultures and I too find it offensive. As well, Ms. Peerbhoy not only tries to paint a nostalgic and fictitious picture of AIs but her picture is based on stereotypes. She needs to take a look at the Anglo Indian women who are/were doctors, professors, teachers etc. instead of focusing on women who danced, drank and wore tight skirts.

  14. Dr Shankar Kumar Chatterjee Says:

    I am not an anglo indian myself but i cannot forget some of my childhood anglo indian friends. they were the most broad minded non parochial lot i have seen and needless to say they were my best friends. Presently i am engaged in a silent mission of reviving hockey in calcutta among young kids. where are the anglo indians who used to dot the hockey fields till not so long ago?

  15. Melville Brooks Says:

    Frank Anthony (Anthony as a surname is questionable) and all the others with Portuguese surnames are not Anglo, The term anglo can only be used if a person has paternal Anglo-Saxon ancestry, I am a proud Anglo-Indian with well documented antecedents going back to over 130 years. Fake Anglos Bugger off don’t masquerade and spoil the image of true blue Anglos.

  16. Rochelle Pereira Says:

    Mr. Brooks,

    As per the Indian Constitution, the term Anglo-Indian pertains to descendants of male Europeans (this is paraphrased) That said, the word “Anglo” does refer to Anglo-Saxon culture, people, history, ancestry etc. Anglo-Indian was also once used to refer to the British population domiciled in India. My point is that it is a fairly ambiguous term, and while there are people who tried to pass as Anglo-Indians, there were as many if not more who did not. Many people with Portuguese last names do not associate themselves with anything Anglo-Indian, while others do. So I think your assessment is unfair, along with your definition of the term. Based on your definition, you also exclude all the “Celtic-Indian” offspring. Many of the British men in India were not just English but Scottish, Irish and Welsh.

    Also, a lack of documentation does not necessarily negate one’s Anglo-Indian status as many British men did not acknowledge their Indian “bibis”, and maintained families on both sides of the ocean. However, it did not make their descendents any less Anglo-Indian.

    Rochelle Pereira

  17. rudolf woodman Says:

    I am proud to be an Anglo – Indian .My e-mail ID is rcwoodman@gmail.com . I live in Mumbai .
    I want to share with you what a few of us are doing for the community .
    Please mail me so I can get in direct touch with you .
    We will never let this community fade away -there are many of us who are well placed and contributing to the welfare of the less fortunate amongst us .
    Nothing will keep us down .

  18. Nagesh Shastry Says:

    Dear sirs,

    I am not an anglo indian and am much younger that most of you I Guess. I have been brought up in urban India in the 80s and the 90s . I find this country hospitable to anyone including Bangladeshi infiltrators as long as you are part of a vote bank. Modern India is vibrant and accomodative to any one enterprising and ready to keep a low profile. What keeps the Anglo Indians from coming back to India ? Why did they leave India in the first place – I am sure they would not know any culture apart from India’s .

  19. Carlton Figg Says:

    This is Brenda, Carlton Figg’s daughter. Just a line to inform you all that my father passed away on Friday 22nd Nov. He is survived by my mum (Audrey), and us four siblings, myself, sons Dexter and Erle and daughter Denise. Dad leaves behind a vaccume that can never be filled. Thank you for your support. He did enjoy corresponding with his online friends and supporters.

  20. Dexter Figg Says:

    Hi Gilbert, I was just going through the sites my dad, Carlton Figg, used to blog on. Just wanted to inform you all that he passed away on the 22nd of November 2008 at 6:30 am India time due to heart failure. I would say he had the interest of the community at heart always. Do keep up the debate and discussion.


Leave a Reply